Business Policy Development and Implementation, Portfolio Project - Essay

Business Policy knowledge and Implementation, Portfolio Project - group Baldwin - CAPSIM Company Evaluation - Essay ExampleWith time when the monopoly market was split with the show of new entrants, the increased cost of manufacture of sensors could not be passed on to its customers. This led to the importance of managing its business enterprise military operation in terms of delivering quality products at competitive price which could be seen from its four more or lesss of proceeding socio-economic class over year (Reuvid, 2012). Comparison of 4 trolls of operation from the Annual Report of group Baldwin The performance of Team Baldwin has been compared as given below from the Annual Reports available in order to see how effectively Team Baldwin has been able to manage its operation in the face of competitive market (Hutt andSpeh, 2012). A jibe of the major performance parameters has been presented below which has been obtained from the Annual Reports year over year from go 1 to Round 4. Key Performance Indicator Analysis Table A Sl. No. ... atomic number 6% 122.91% 145.93% 144.96% 6 sales 90798 116913 155053 154514 19.39% 100% 128.76% 170.77% 170.17% 7 Inventory 8617 0 -2180 -5589 -186.56% 100% 0.00% -25.30% -64.86% 8 Net Profit 45 4346 16010 16747 619.30% 100% 9657.78% 35577.78% 37215.56% 9 Accounts payable -2277 2479 1521 379 -155.01% 100% -108.87% -66.80% -16.64% 10 Accounts receivable 845 -2146 -3135 44 -62.66% 100% -253.96% -371.01% 5.21% 11 Net funds from operation 14383 13232 21578 20942 13.34% 100% 92.00% 150.02% 145.60% N.B. Amounts are given in dollars and () represents negative value The above represent a common-size analysis on the parameters identified to be indicative for the performance of Team Baldwin over round 1 to round 4 from 2014 to 2017. The table also indicates a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of the detect performance parameters. Total market handle and revenue In round 1 in the year 2014, the market share of Team Baldwin is 19.15%, in round 2 in 2015 is 21.5%, in round 3 in 2016 is 26.64% and in round 4 in 2017 is 26.24%. Thus, an increasing trend of market share of Team Baldwin can be observed with respect to its competitors in sensor manufacturing. If we look at the Income statement of Team Baldwin in the Annual reports and subsequent comparative analysis in Table-A, we would find that the total revenue or sales of the company has shown an increasing trend from round 1 (year 2014) to round 5 (year 2017). With respect to the round 1 in the year 2014, the revenue earned by Team Baldwin has increased 28.76% in round 2 (year 2015) and over 70% in round 3 (year 2016) and round 4 (year 2017). The market share of a company increases when it is successful in managing its operations and plan strategies by anticipating responses from its